Symposium on Gibbon Diversity and Conservation:Abstracts |
Thomas Geissmann
Gibbon Research Lab., Hannover
thomas.geissmann@thiho-hannover.de
29 May 2002, updated 30 June 2002
As announced last fall, I am organizing a symposium with the title "Gibbon Diversity
and Conservationî at the 19th Congress of the International Primatological Society
(Beijing, China, August 4-9, 2002).
I received an overwhelming total of 32 abstracts. An updated list of abstracts is
presented below. In addition, the whole list can be downloaded in PDF format (click
here to download the file). As a result of the high number of
participants, the symposium will last two full days.
Press a button to jump to a particular abstract.
M. Farid Ahsan
Present address: EPSS/MESU, Environment Department, PO Box 67, Dubai, UAE, e-mail:
mfaridahsan@yahoo.com
Permanent address: Department of Zoology, University of Chittagong, Chittagong 4331,
Bangladesh, e-mail: mfahsan@ctgu.edu
Key Words: Bunopithecus hoolock, social behavior, Bangladesh
I collected data on territoriality and social structure of the hoolock gibbons (Bunopithecus
hoolock). The gibbons were studied in the Lawachara area of the West Bhanugach
Reserve Forest, Sylhet (Bangladesh). Data were collected between July 1989 and July
1990. Hoolock gibbons defend territories with fixed boundaries against neighbouring
groups. Territorial disputes occur mainly over occupancy of food sources. The hoolock
gibbon is monogamous. Monogamy appears to be maintained by adult mated females through
exclusion of potentially reproductive other females, whereas adult males are opportunistically
polygynous.
M. Farid Ahsan
Present address: EPSS/MESU, Environment Department, PO Box 67, Dubai, UAE, e-mail:
mfaridahsan@yahoo.com
Permanent address: Department of Zoology, University of Chittagong, Chittagong 4331,
Bangladesh, e-mail: mfahsan@ctgu.edu
Key Words: Bunopithecus hoolock, status, Bangladesh
The status and conservation issues of the hoolock gibbons of Bangladesh are discussed,
based on primate field studies carried out since 1979. Different forested areas of
the country were frequently surveyed from a conservational point of view. Habitat
loss was identified as the main reason for dwindling gibbon population in Bangladesh.
The major factors of habitat loss are discussed and several suggestions on how to
conserve the gibbons and the biodiversity in the survey areas are presented.
Thad Q. Bartlett
Department of Anthropology, The University of Texas at San Antonio, 6900 North Loop
1604 West, San Antonio, TX 78249, U.S.A., e-mail: tbartlett@utsa.edu
Key Words: Hylobates, social behavior, territoriality
Gibbons are broadly recognized as territorial in the classic sense of maintaining
areas of exclusive use. As a result, it is commonly assumed that gibbon groups represent
social isolates and that intra-group social interaction is rare and inter-group interactions
are exclusively hostile. However, observations of white-handed gibbons in Khao Yai
National Park, Thailand have demonstrated that inter-group encounters are not exclusively
hostile and that the level of intra-group social activity is higher than previously
estimated. These findings obligate a reconsideration of territoriality and social
organization among gibbons.
From January 1994 to January 1995 the socio-ecology of two previously habituated
gibbon social groups was studied as part of continuing research on white-handed gibbons
(Hylobates lar) in Khao Yai National Park, Thailand. During full-day follows
I recorded the occurrence of both intra- and inter-group social interactions. Affiliative
social behavior was classified as wrestle play, chase play, grooming, and social
contact. The overall rate of social behavior was 11% and varied considerably between
months (range 3-20%). Rates of social activity were highest during the hot dry season
when ripe fruit was most abundant. Grooming was the most common social activity in
all age-sex classes except juveniles. All categories of social behavior were also
recorded between individuals from neighboring groups. Young gibbons, in particular,
regularly turned to other groups to find social partners.
I argue that affiliative social interactions between neighbors are indicative of
a complex social system that can be described by a nested hierarchy. I hypothesize
that at each level of this hierarchy the boundaries between groups are linked to
aspects of the physical landscape and may be maintained through social traditions
Research supported by grants from Fulbright, The National Science Foundation, Boise
Fund, Sigma Xi, The American Society of Primatologists and Dickinson College.
Warren Y. Brockelman1,2 and Udomlux Suwanvecho2
1 Center for Conservation Biology, ISTRD, Mahidol University, Salaya,
Phutthamonthon, Nakhon Pathom 73170, Thailand, e-mail: wybrock@cscoms.com
2 Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Mahidol University, Rama
VI Road, Bangkok 10400, Thailand
Key Words: adaptive radiation, Hylobatidae, territoriality
The gibbons comprise a family of 11 species of apes which started speciating at least
5 million years ago. This is ample time in which to have evolved behavioral and ecological
differences among the species, yet all extant species appear to be characterized
by small territorial groups, long term monogamous pairing, and loud songs which in
most species are structured duets. This talk addresses three questions: (1) what
behavioral variability exists among the species, (2) what is the range of variability
within species, and (3) what has constrained the evolution of behavioral and ecological
diversity within the family. Detailed observations of behavior and ecology exist
for nearly all species, but long term observations of group formation and dynamics
exist for only two: Hylobates (Symphalangus) syndactylus and
Hylobates lar. The long term studies indicate that group composition
and pair formation methods are more flexible than previously thought, but that long
term monogamous pairing is the predominant, if not the sole, social pattern.
Gibbon species differ in details of vocal behavior, song pattern, diet, and perhaps
group size, but a lack of knowledge of the range of variation within most species
precludes an assessment of the significance of species differences. It is here argued
that the relative lack of behavioral diversity within the family Hylobatidae is due
to ecological and associated morphological constraints. Explaining how these constraints
operate will require answers to the following questions: (1) why does the ëgibbon
nicheí require small group size and territorial behavior; (2) how have the gibbonsí
food resource requirements and territorial behavior prevented sympatry between the
species (excepting the siamang), and hence largely restricted adaptive radiation
within the family. More detailed and integrated studies of ranging, diet, foraging,
and social behavior, especially competition, are needed to answer these questions.
Aurelien Brule (Chanee)
Etho-Passion Society, Jl Pinus No 14, Palangka Raya, Central Kalimantan, Indonesia,
e-mail: kalaweit@hotmail.com
Key Words: gibbons, rehabilitation, Indonesia
The Island of Borneo harbours an enormous variety of animal and plant species. Among
the life forms found here are many primates of which two are anthropoids. The first
and best known is the orang-utan (Pongo pygmaeus). The second, also threatened,
is the gibbon. Two gibbon species occur on Borneo: the agile gibbon (Hylobates
agilis) and the Muellerís gibbon (Hylobates muelleri). Etho-Passion (EP),
a French society of conservation, have created the first Kalimantan gibbon conservation
program: the Kalaweit Program. This program was started on 29 September 1999 with
the signature of the Memorandum of Understanding between EP and the Ministry of Forestry
and Estate Crops of the Republic of Indonesia. The program receives infant animals
whose mothers have been killed, with the aim of avoiding the same fate for them.
The rehabilitation center (Kalaweit Station) is situated in the virgin jungle of
the Bukit Baka Bukit Raya National Park (181,090 ha). The gibbonsí return to the
wild will be a process covering several years. The Kalaweit Program shall include
rehabilitation, research, socialization/information (in collaboration with several
radio / TV stations), education, and technical assistance for to help the local government
in the protection of the Bukit Baka Bukit Raya National Park.
Pranab Bujarbarua1 and S.K. Sarma2
1 Plant Ecology Lab., Department of Botany, Gauhati University, Guwahati;
P.O. Gauhati University; 781 014 Assam (India), e-mail: pranab_bujarbarua@rediffmail.com
2 Plant Ecology Lab., Department ob Botany, Gauhati University, Guwahati;
P.O. Gauhati University; 781 014 Assam (India).
Key Words: food habits, hoolock gibbon, gibbon wildlife sanctuary
We carried out a study on the feeding habits of the primates of Gibbon Wildlife Sanctuary
in Assam (India) during 1998-1999. The sanctuary harbours 7 species of non-human
primates within an area of 1915.6 hectares. A total of 288 hours observation on the
hoolock gibbons (Bunopithecus hoolock) of the sanctuary revealed that they
spend 25.17% and 33.79% of their daily activity feeding during the wet and the dry
season, respectively. Fruits formed 72.97% of the gibbon diet during the wet season,
whereas the gibbons ate mostly leaves (young and mature) during the dry season. Besides,
the gibbons also ate minor amounts of flower buds, flowers, leaf petioles, moss,
algae, lichen and insects. A total number of 21 plant species belonging to 13 families
and 18 genera were used as food by the gibbons of the sanctuary. Intra- and interspecific
interactions were also observed during our study. Interspecific interactions involving
gibbons and capped langurs were observed at food sources used by both primate species.
Our study documents that leaves form a major part of the diet of hoolock gibbons
of the sanctuary during the dry season, although most gibbons are usually considered
to be frugivorous animals.
Helen J. Chatterjee
Grant Museum of Zoology, Department of Biology, Darwin Building, University College
London, Gower Street, London, WC1E 6BT, U.K., e-mail: h.chatterjee@ucl.ac.uk
Key Words: phylogeny, biogeography, dispersal-vicariance analysis
Phylogenetic relationships among gibbons are controversial. This study uses molecular
and morphological data to resolve some of these controversies, and aims to provide
a new phylogeny for the gibbons. The estimate of gibbon phylogeny is combined with
distribution data to reconstruct the biogeographic history of gibbons.
In the first part of the study, original mitochondrial control region sequence data and published cytochrome b gene sequence data are analysed using maximum likelihood, parsimony and bootstrapping methods. Results of these analyses indicate a gibbon phylogeny which shows the following generic relationships: Nomascus, Symphalangus and Bunopithecus are successively more closely related to Hylobates. A molecular clock is employed which suggests that the gibbon radiation dates to about 10.5 million years ago (Ma).
In the second part of the study, craniodental and postcranial metric variables are analysed using multivariate statistical methods to investigate interspecific morphological variability. Multivariate statistical analyses across the gibbon skeleton show that the eleven species included in the analyses form five distinct morphological groups. The metric data are further employed to investigate phylogenetic inter-relationships among gibbons. These data are converted into discrete character states using segment and range coding. The re-coded data are analysed using parsimony and bootstrapping methods. These analyses indicate that gibbon skeletal metric data is phylogenetically uninformative at the species or genus level.
In the third part of the study, three alternative methods of biogeographic reconstruction are employed: ancestral area analysis using irreversible parsimony, ancestral area analysis using reversible parsimony and dispersal-vicariance analysis (DIVA). Results of the DIVA analysis are combined with estimates of divergence dates, to propose a new pattern of radiation for the gibbons. This analysis indicates that the gibbon radiation may have begun in Indochina around 10.5 Ma. Between 10.5 and 8.6 Ma gibbons radiated southwards to Sumatra. Subsequently, they differentiated into two types of gibbon on Sumatra, representing the genera Symphalangus and Hylobates. A third radiation approximately 7-8 Ma saw the dispersal of Bunopithecus into Burma, Assam, and Bangladesh. At around 3-5 Ma there was a second radiation of genus Hylobates, involving dispersal onto the islands of Borneo, Mentawai and Java. Between 0.3 and 1.8 Ma taxa in the genus Nomascus differentiated into Cambodia and Hainan Island.
This study provides a novel reconstruction of the historical biogeography of gibbons. In addition, parsimony and likelihood analyses of molecular and morphological data sheds light on the controversial topic of gibbon phylogeny.
Susan M. Cheyne
Wildlife Research Group, Department of Anatomy, University of Cambridge, Downing
Street, Cambridge CB2 3DY, U.K., e-mail: fael_inis@hotmail.com
Field address: Kalaweit Care Centre, Jl. Pinus
No. 14, Palangka Raya, Kalteng, Indonesia.
Key Words: gibbons, rehabilitation, Indonesia
The past 30 years have seen vast resources/research time focusing on rehabilitation/reintroduction
of orang-utans throughout their home range. Until now, all similar efforts to rehabilitate
ex-captive gibbons have been educated guesswork, accompanied up by little or no pre-release
assessment of the suitability of the individuals involved, or follow-up monitoring.
The only report on a gibbon rehabilitation project in Thailand states that all releases
failed, probably due to the poor quality relationships between the released adults.
Most releases from this project have been based on subjective impression and not
objective scientific data. Until this issue is addressed, many released gibbons will
continue to perish, having contributed nothing to the survival potential of the species.
A study was initiated in March 2002 to begin systematic behavioural assessment of
ex-captive gibbons being rehabilitated at the Kalaweit Programme, Central Kalimantan.
Upon arrival at Kalaweit, all gibbons are placed in quarantine cages to undergo medical
testing: for TB (anti TB Igg), HepBsAb, HepBsAg, anit-HSV1 and anti-HSV2 antibodies.
Gibbons are housed alone until results are known. Healthy gibbons are transported
to the rehabilitation site located in the Bukit Baka/Bukit Raya National Park. Only
mature subadults and adults are considered for release.
Initial findings on feeding and social behaviour, and activity patterns of the ex-captives
are presented, with comparisons to wild populations. The validity of the results
as tools for identifying if (a) an individual is suitable for rehabilitation and
(b) a pair is suitable for release, are appraised. Also presented are future research
plans and how the preliminary data is being used to plan future releases and pair
compatible individuals at Kalaweit.
I suggest that several factors in the individualís life history may be involved in
the differences between the gibbonsí performances in the rehabilitation process.
Zsófia Clemens1, Mária
Ujhelyi2 and Björn Merker3
1 Institute of Behavioural Sciences, Semmelweis University, Budapest,
Hungary, e-mail: clemenszsofia@hotmail.com
2 Institute of Behavioural Sciences, Semmelweis University, Budapest,
Hungary, e-mail: bjorn.merker@kmh.se
3 Center for Research in Music Education, The Royal University College
of Music, Stockholm, Sweden, e-mail: ujhmar@net.sote.hu
Key Words: Hylobates lar, paternal care, parental investment
Among the small apes, only siamang males are known to display extensive paternal
caretaking behaviour. Here we report on paternal behaviour observed in a white-handed
gibbon (Hylobates lar) family at the Debrecen Zoo (Hungary). The animals were
observed and filmed for 4 hours, every 6 weeks, throughout one year. Behavioural
measures taken from the films for the analysis were as follows: types and duration
of social parent-offspring interactions; and the initiator of all dyadic social interactions.
In order to get further information about parental motivations, two types of interventions
were introduced: 1. preferential feeding to check patterns of food sharing; 2. alternating
separation of the group members.
During the study period we observed sustained biparental care. The male was highly
interested in the infant and spent a substantial amount of time in dyadic interactions
with it. Although the maleís interactions with the infant included most elements
of maternal care, the pattern of dealing with the infant (type of care, time budget,
and initiating interactions) showed marked gender differences and changes in time
span. While the comfort-giving behaviours (carrying, defending) were largely carried
out by the female, behaviours requiring more tolerance (such as playing and food
sharing) were displayed by the father.
Because some field observations and our unpublished study on siamangs also support
the presence of similar preferential maternal and paternal roles, we suggest that
a tendency toward role differentiation is present in small apes which deserves further
research.
Jayanta Das1,2 and P.C. Bhattacherjee1
1 Animal Ecology and Wildlife Biology Lab., Department of Zoology, Gauhati
University, Guwahati-781014, Assam, India, e-mail: gibbonconservation@yahoo.com
2 Primate Research Centre, 396, 3rd ëCí Road, Sardarpura, Jodhpur 342003,
India, e-mail: prcindia@sify.com
Key Words: Bunopithecus hoolock, ecology, India
The survival of frugivorous, brachiator species like gibbons mostly depends on the
continuous availability of sufficiently rich food sources throughout the year. During
an extensive field study from October 1998 to December 2000, two groups of hoolock
gibbons (Bunopithecus hoolock) were observed, one in undisturbed (Namdapha National
Park) and one disturbed habitat (Borajan Reserved Forest). A major difference in
the activity patterns was observed between the two habitats: In the disturbed habitat,
gibbons spent less time feeding (42.78% versus 54.28%), grooming (0.94% versus 2.32%,
and singing (0.63% versus 1.60%); whereas they spent more time resting (46.17% versus
33.64%), travelling (6.17% versus 5.59%) and monitoring (2.96% versus 2.14%). The
distribution and abundance of the food resources in different seasons is thought
to represent the major guiding factor for allocating time in various activities in
different habitats. These differences in the major activities have serious long-term
consequences for the survival of hoolock gibbons.
This study was supported by the grant agreement no. INT / FWS-22.
Jayanta Das1,2, P.C. Bhattacherjee1
and S.M. Mohnot2
1 Animal Ecology and Wildlife Biology Lab., Department of Zoology, Gauhati
University, Guwahati-781014, Assam, India, e-mail: gibbonconservation@yahoo.com
2 Primate Research Centre, 396, 3rd ëCí Road, Sardarpura, Jodhpur 342003,
India, e-mail: prcindia@sify.com
Key Words: Bunopithecus hoolock, status, India
The distribution in relation to time and space is the core to the evaluation of the
species status. But a wider distribution range does not necessarily qualify better
success and survival possibilities. Detailed surveys were carried out in 110 forests
in 16 forest divisions of Assam during 1995-1997. The state Assam with a geographic
area of 78,438 km2 has 5 National Parks, 14 Wildlife Sanctuaries and several Reserve
Forests (17,422 km2), Proposed Reserve Forests (2,815 km2), Unclassed State Forests
(5,894 km2). Protected areas in Assam cover only 2.63% of the total geographic area
of the state, and hoolock gibbons (Bunopithecus hoolock) are found in only
1.03% of the protected areas. An area of 6,405 km2 has been estimated as hoolock
habitat. Hoolock gibbons were recorded from 5 Protected Areas and from 62 other forests
of all surveyed forests. Most protected areas are either grasslands or too small
to support a viable population. The major threat for hoolock gibbons in Assam is
habitat loss, followed by hunting and improper implementation of Wildlife Protection
Acts and Laws. Thirty candidate priority areas and 6 conservation landscapes have
been identified for future hoolock gibbon conservation in Assam.
This survey was supported by the grant agreement no. INT / FWS-22.
Mohammed M. Feeroz
Department of Zoology, Jahangirnagar University, Savar, Dhaka-1342, Bangladesh, e-mail:
feeroz@juniv.edu
Key Words: Bunopithecus hoolock, conservation, Bangladesh
Among the nine species of primates of Bangladesh, hoolock gibbon Bunopithecus
hoolock is the only lesser apes found in the evergreen and semi-evergreen forests
of north-east and south-east of the country. Group size of B. hoolock varied
from 2 to 5 (mean = 3.03, sd±0.82, n = 34), population density varying from
0.5 to 1.3 gibbons/km2 (mean = 0.8 gibbons/km2). This species is found in monogamous
families comprising of one adult male and one adult female with their offspring.
This species is sympatric with three other primate species in most of its habitat.
The population of this species is declining in all other areas except the West Bhanugach
Forest Reserve. This forest reserve supports nearly 30% hoolock gibbon groups of
the country. Rapid degradation of the forest due to increased population pressure,
highway construction, expansion of agricultural field, betel cultivation, unlimited
fuel wood extraction and cattle grazing are the major constant threats for the survival
of this species in Bangladesh. There is no existing laws for the protection of this
species or no area has been declared as gibbon sanctuary in the country.
Thomas Geissmann
Institute of Zoology, Tierärztliche Hochschule, Bünteweg 17, 30559 Hannover,
Germany, e-mail: thomas.geissmann@gibbons.de
Key Words: species loss, vanishing apes, conservation bias
In an ever increasing way, media and scientists alike have succeeded in making us
aware of the plight of the great apes, while at the same time ignoring the gibbons
or small apes. We are being taught that the great apes are "neglected apesî,
"forgotten apesî or "vanishing apesî (book titles on great apes), and that
our first conservation priority among primates should be directed at these species.
A simple review of research and publication activities documents that not the great
apes, but the small apes are the true neglected or forgotten apes. Similarly, a review
of the population numbers suffices to show that conservation priorities should be
directed at small apes. Even the most endangered species of great apes (Pongo
abelii) still has populations of more than 10,000 individuals in the wild. In
contrast, there are at least three gibbon species (e.g. Nomascus concolor,
N. sp. cf. nasutus, Hylobates moloch) with less than 3,000 individuals.
Population sizes of several gibbon species have not been estimated since the early
1980ís or are "data deficient.î Whereas research on, and conservation activities
directed at, the great apes are supported by a strong lobby, gibbons tend to be overlooked
whenever media, scientists, funding agencies and conservation agencies are referring
to apes. Gibbons are largely ignored in current debates about ape conservation (bush
meat, world heritage status for great apes, etc.). The long-standing tradition to
favor great apes, or to ignore the small apes, has in recent years contributed to
divert from the increasingly critical status of many gibbon populations and may result
in the loss of several ape species. In order to survive, the small apes need to get
out of the shadow of the great apes and obtain an equivalent share of attention from
conservation agencies, scientists and media alike.
Thomas Geissmann1, Robert Dallmann2
and Jennifer Pastorini3
1 Institute of Zoology, Tierärztliche Hochschule, Bünteweg 17,
30559 Hannover, Germany, e-mail: thomas.geissmann@gibbons.de
2 Institute of Zoology, Tierärztliche Hochschule, Bünteweg 17,
30559 Hannover, Germany, e-mail: robert@dallmanns.de
3 Anthropologisches Institut, Universität Zürich, Winterthurerstrasse
190, 8057 Zürich, Switzerland, e-mail: jenny@aim.unizh.ch
Key Words: systematics, rehabilitation program, conservation
Although Sody (1949) described Central Javan gibbons as a distinct subspecies (Hylobates
lar pongoalsoni), this was not confirmed by subsequent taxonomists, and Javan
gibbons (Hylobates moloch) are traditionally being regarded as monotypic.
Recently, DNA sequence data from the control region of Javan zoo and pet gibbons
were reported to suggest the presence of two genetically differentiated lineages
representing different management units that should be managed separately (Supriatna
et al. 1999; Andayani et al. 2001). As a result, it was concluded that
pet animals from both areas cannot be pooled for a rehabilitation program and that
genetic screening should be applied before sending any pets to such a program (Supriatna
& Manullang 1999). Some authors accept this as evidence for the presence of two
gibbon subspecies on Java (Supriatna & Wahyono 2000), and this view has also
been adopted by the IUCN Red List.
We critically examine all available evidence relevant for the systematics of this
species. Our analysis of fur coloration of the majority of museum skins from known
Javan localities does not support the recognition of two distinct populations. A
detailed analysis of gibbon song vocalizations recorded from all major wild populations
of H. moloch weakly supports the recognition of two clades, but the boundary
between them is located much more to the east than the boundary reported to exist
between the molecular clades. A re-analysis of the published DNA sequences produces
up to six genetically distinct clades. In addition, genetic divergences within each
clade reach the range for between clade comparisons. Based on the available evidence,
recognition of two subspecies is not warranted. This finding has direct implications
for any programs directed at breeding and rehabilitating Javan silvery gibbons.
Colin Groves
School of Archaeology & Anthropology, Australian National University, Canberra,
ACT 0200, Australia, e-mail: colin.groves@anu.edu.au
Key Words: hylobatidae, hoolock gibbon, Bunopithecus
The 14 or so species of gibbons (Hylobatidae) have, until recently, been placed
in a single genus, Hylobates, with four subgenera. The hoolock gibbon is called Hylobates
(Bunopithecus) hoolock under this scheme. It has been argued by Geissmann
and others that the four subgenera would be better ranked as full genera, and this
seems appropriate for many reasons ó in particular, the genetic distances between
them, at least as far as mtDNA is concerned, are greater than that between Homo
and Pan. But generic names have a high profile in a way which subgeneric names
do not, and if we are to raise the subgenera to genera we must examine whether the
names are appropriate.
The name Bunopithecus is based on a fossil jaw fragment, with two molars,
from the Middle Pleistocene site of Yanjinggou (Yenchingkou), in Sichuan, China.
The name has been used for the hoolock because the molars are said to show the features
by which those of the hoolock differ from other gibbons. Close examination shows
that the fossil actually stands outside the range of morphology of modern gibbons;
probably the genus Bunopithecus is valid, but refers only to the fossil species,
B. sericus. A new generic name must be coined for the hoolock.
Atul K. Gupta
Department of Population Management, Capture & Rehabilitation, Wildlife Institute
of India, PO Box 18, Chandrabani, Dehradun 248 006, Uttaranchal, India, e-mail: akg@wii.gov.in
Key Words: Bunopithecus hoolock, status, India
The hoolock gibbon (Bunopithecus hoolock), the only ape species in India,
is the western most of the nine species of lesser apes of Southeast Asia. Its distribution
is restricted to the monsoon and evergreen rain forests of northeast India south
of Brahmaputra River, Southern Yunnan and Myanmar up to the river Chindwin. Although,
it is categorized as endangered by IUCN and listed in Schedule I of the Wildlife
(Protection) Act, 1972 of India. Present knowledge of gibbon ecology and population
estimate comes only from few studies. Lowland tropical rain forests in northeast
India, the major gibbon habitats, are the most species-rich of the terrestrial ecosystems.
These lowland forests, however, are now present in form of fragments of varying size,
shape, and succession stages mainly due to agricultural expansion, illegal encroachment,
shifting cultivation, establishment of tea and coffee estates, illegal logging, poaching
and hunting, and diversion of forest land for developmental projects as faulty land-use
policies.
The gibbonsí frugivorous diet, high territoriality, and adaptation for brachiation
easily make them the most threatened species in those areas where habitat loss and
fragmentation have been intense. Fragmentation of the habitat may result in reduced
availability of their preferred food-fruit and their highly territorial nature or
ëspatial inflexibilityí may prevent them from exploiting food resources in adjoining
areas. Further, their brachiatory locomotion makes their movement impossible in habitats
without canopy contiguity. The population size of monogamous gibbons having small
family size and low reproductive output can not exceed beyond a small maximum even
if environmental conditions improve. The ideal conservation measures may include
both short-and long-term measures including check on fragmentation, poaching and
illegal hunting for ethnic medicines, and conservation education to create awareness
on the conservation of gibbons.
Jiang Xuelong and Wang Yingxiang
Kunming Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Science, Kunming 650223, China,
e-mail: jiangxl@mail.kiz.ac.cn
Key Words: Nomascus concolor, status, China
Wuliang mountain was declared a provincial reserve in 1986 and was upgraded to a
national reserve in 2000. It is located in central Yunnan, China, between the Mekong
and Black rivers, and includes parts of three counties (Jingdong, Zhengyuan, and
Nanjian). Ecology, behaviour and conservation of the western black crested gibbon
(Nomascus concolor) have been studied there since 1985. The gibbon of Wuliang
mountain was described as a distinct subspecies (N. c. jingdongensis) in 1986.
Previous estimates of its population size differed widely (51-300 groups).
We present new results of a detailed survey of this population and its distribution,
conducted by five teams from November 4, 2001, to January 6, 2002. Two teams surveyed
the eastern slope and two teams the western slope in Jingdong and Zhengyuan, and
one team surveyed the Nanjian sector. Groups were identified and located by their
characteristic loud calls and direct sightings. We recorded ninety-seven gibbon groups
in Wuliang. They inhabit semi-humid evergreen broad-leaved forest and mid-montane
humid evergreen broad-leaved forest at elevations of 1800-2660 meters. Gibbons are
more abundant in the southern part, with more groups occurring on the eastern than
on the western slope. Previous reports suggested that the population was isolated
in 38 forest patches ranging from 70-2500 ha in 1995.
Our current surveys show that habitat fragmentation is less severe than reported
before. The population is thinly spread, however, because some neighbouring groups
are separated by distances of 3-4 kilometers. The low population density is now the
main concern for the conservation of this endemic subspecies. Our study also demonstrates
that hunting and deforestation are still resulting in the extirpation of groups and
habitat loss in some areas. In addition, road and power-line constructions are increasing
the fragmentation of the population.
Mai Dang Khoa, James Hardcastle and Frank Momberg
Fauna & Flora International ó Indochina Programme, IPO Box 78, 104B Pho Hue,
Hanoi, Vietnam, e-mail: ffi@fpt.vn
Key Words: Nomascus, conservation strategy, Vietnam
Primate conservation initiatives in Vietnam largely fail to address a lack of law
enforcement, a lack of conservation awareness, and a lack of land-use planning that
takes into account the need for biodiversity conservation. Top-down approaches in
protected area gazettement have alienated local communities.
Fauna & Flora Internationalís (FFI) discovery of 39 groups of western black crested
gibbons (Nomascus concolor) in Che Tao forest, North Vietnam, reconfirmed
their continued existence in the country for the first time since the 1960ís. To
date a minimum of 91 individuals are confirmed in Che Tao ó without doubt the largest
population of the species in Vietnam, yet critically threatened by habitat fragmentation
and hunting pressures.
In response, FFI initiated a strategy and action plan for the community and district
authorities to take on protection activities themselves. This ëevolvedí into a community-based
project. Under the banner of long-term protection for gibbons in Che Tao, the project
has instilled a clear-cut sense of ownership amongst both local people and district
departments, to harness local capacity for conservation, and to demote FFIís role
to facilitator.
Key interventions include awareness raising, household-level gibbon hunting ban agreements,
community ëforest stewardship councilsí to take on forest management responsibilities,
and a land use mapping exercise to incorporate local resource needs into the protection
strategy.
Building on the participatory approach and local consensus, the area will be gazetted
as a ëGibbon Sanctuaryí. This gazettement is based on three tenets: of community
co-management; of community access to resources; and local recruitment of forest
rangers. Forest stewardship councils will be the foundation for the local management
board of the Sanctuary.
FFI will continue to support Che Tao with an aim to build up local capacity to continue
to develop a solid programme that supports conservation of gibbons, their habitat
and local resource needs.
Margaret Kinnaird, Timothy OíBrien, Anton Nurcahyo
and Maya Prasetyaningrum
Wildlife Conservation Society, P. O. Box 311, Bogor, 16003, Indonesia, e-mail: wcs-ip@indo.net.id
Key Words: siamang, territoriality, calling
We examine siamang calling in the context of territorial defense and describe intergroup
interactions among four habituated groups in a southern Sumatran rainforest. At least
three groups were followed simultaneously five days per month for one year. We recorded
day range, feeding trees, frequency, location and direction of calls and counter
calls, and context in which intergroup interactions occurred. Groups defended territories
ranging from 14.8-26.7 hectares but territories overlapped by as much as 32%. Groups
called and engaged in counter calling with neighbors more often from territory boundaries
than from the center of territories. Groups directed calls and counter calls in an
outward direction four times more than toward territory centers. Number of fruiting
trees in a siamang territory had significant effects on frequency of monthly calling.
Counter calling occurred more often when inter-group distances were <50 m and
in the proximity of fruiting trees. Counter calling was more strongly influenced
by number of fruiting trees than calling alone, suggesting that neighbors call and
counter call more often as territories become more valuable. Percent of fruit in
the diet however had no significant effect on rates of calling or counter calling,
suggesting that the defensibility of fruit resources is more important than availability
alone. The majority of intergroup interactions (inter-group distances < 100 m)
occurred in or in the proximity of fruiting trees and resulted in neutral outcomes
with both groups retreating from the conflict. The smallest group with the smallest
but richest territory was involved in the most intergroup interactions, and lost
most frequently when there was a decisive outcome. Calling appears to be effective
for territorial defense but when calling fails to mediate conflict, group size may
be important. Territorial defense remains the most parsimonious explanation for evolution
of calling in siamangs.
Christina Klein1 and Lori K. Sheeran2
1 International Center for Gibbon Studies, POB 800249, Santa Clarita,
CA 91830, U.S.A., e-mail: gibbon1@earthlink.net
2 Department of Anthropology, POB 6846, CSUF, Fullerton, CA 92834-6846,
U.S.A., e-mail: lsheeran@fullerton.edu
Key Words: survival rates, parental investment, gibbons
Aspects of a speciesí natural history, such as predation and diet, impact on life
history traits such as life span and maturation and mortality rates. We often lack
data from wild populations to enable exploration of relationships between life history
events and natural history, but captive populations often provide a large database
from which demographic information can be gleaned. Allman et al. (1998) used
studbook and other data to explore primate mortality in terms of the caregiving roles
of adults. They hypothesized that the sex that is the primary caregiver should have
higher survival rates. They found that female chimpanzees, spider monkeys, orangutans,
lar gibbons, gorillas, and humans had a survival advantage over males. Male siamangs
and Goeldiís, owl, and titi monkeys had higher survival rates than did their female
counterparts, which they argued is a consequence of these malesí expanded caregiving
roles. Using studbook data, we focused on lar gibbons and siamangs to further explore
Allmanís hypothesis and conclusions. For both species, we tested the null hypothesis
that males and females have the same mortality rates. Because mortality differences
may become apparent or more pronounced at particular life stages, we ran logistic
regressions on four reproductive age groups spanning 8 to 20+ years. We also compared
the overall mortality rates of siamangs and lar gibbons. For both species, we found
that male and female mortality rates are the same. However, in all four reproductive
age groups, siamangs of both sexes have a survivorship advantage over lar gibbons
of both sexes. Our data do not support Allmanís hypothesis that sex differences in
caregiving roles yield differences in survival rates of the two sexes. Instead, we
suggest that the siamangís survival advantage is related to other aspects of its
natural history, such as increased folivory.
Allman, J.; Rosin, A.; Kumar, R. & Hasenstaub, A. 1998: Parenting and survival
in anthropoid primates: Caretakers live longer. Proceedings National Academy of Sciences
95(12): 6866-6888.
Susan Lappan
New York Consortium for Evolutionary Primatology, Department of Anthropology, New
York University, 25 Waverly Place, New York, NY 10003, U.S.A., e-mail: sl232@nyu.edu
Key Words: siamang, polyandry, mating system
Most early studies of hylobatid socioecology (e.g. Carpenter 1944; Chivers 1974)
emphasized gibbon monogamy, characterized by long-term pair-bonds between adult males
and females, cooperative territorial defense, and the gradual peripheralization and
emigration of offspring as they reached maturity. However, more recently, extra-pair
copulation (Reichard & Sommers 1997; Palombit 1994), transfer of immatures between
groups (Oka & Takenaka 2001), and even possible cases of social polygyny (Jiang
et al. 1999; Bleisch & Nan 1990) have been reported in gibbons. These
observations demonstrate that gibbons display a much wider diversity of social and
mating strategies than previously understood. At the WCS/ PHKA Way Canguk Research
Station in southern Sumatra, the long-term retention of multiple adult-sized males
in siamang groups is relatively common. This presentation reports new observations
of polyandrous mating within three multi-male siamang groups, and discusses potential
benefits of polyandry for siamang males. A possible relationship between population
density and siamang social and mating strategies is proposed.
Siamangs are unusual among gibbons in that males have been reported to provide extensive
care for infants, especially during the second year of infant life, in the form of
infant carrying. In this study, infant carrying by all adult-sized males (and some
immature males) in polyandrous groups was observed, although the frequency of infant
carrying varied between males, both within and between groups. While data on the
relationship between the number of males in a group and infant survival are not currently
available, helping by "extraî males may provide an important benefit to dominant
males. Tolerance of extra males within the group may also function to reduce the
loss of paternity to extra-group males.
Katja Liebal1 and Michael Tomasello2
1 Max-Planck-Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Inselstraße
22, 04103 Leipzig, Germany, e-mail: liebal@eva.mpg.de
2 Max-Planck-Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Inselstraße
22, 04103 Leipzig, Germany, e-mail: tomas@eva.mpg.de
Key Words: intentional signals, recipientís state of attention, flexible use of signals
The vast majority of work on primate communication has concerned vocalizations, but
just as important are their gestures and facial expressions, which have been studied
in only a few primate species, mostly in macaques and chimpanzees. Almost nothing
is known about the use of those signals in lesser apes (Hylobatidae) and the influence
of social or ecological factors on the communication of those primates.
In the present study social communication using intentional signals was investigated
in captive siamang groups (Symphalangus syndactylus). The goal was 1) to describe
the signal repertoire (tactile, visual gestures, actions and facial expressions),
2) to focus on gender, sex and age differences and 3) to investigate the use of signals
in terms of flexibility (context, attentional state of recipient).
Fourteen individuals of four groups each consisting of an adult pair and two or three
offspring were observed in two different zoos.
During 138 hours of observation, 34 different signals containing 14 tactile and 10
visual gestures, 6 actions as well as 4 facial expressions were observed. Tactile
gestures and facial expressions were observed most often. Differences between groups
concerning the number and frequency of used signals were caused above all by the
social constellation of the family or housing conditions. Although most of the signals
were common in all individuals, some signals were only used by a particular age class.
There was also an influence of age in context with the use of the signals depending
on the state of the recipient. Adult siamangs performed visual signals exclusively
toward an attending recipient, whereas infants used this signal category also toward
a not attending individual. Differences between the repertoire of genders were less
distinct.
Summarizing the signal repertoire of siamangs can be described as variable and multifaceted
range of different signals, which underlies the influence of different social and
ecological parameters.
Nicholas Malone1 and Agustin Fuentes1,2
1 Department of Anthropology, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR 97403-1218,
U.S.A., e-mail: nmalone@darkwing.uoregon.edu
2 Department of Anthropology, Notre Dame University, Notre Dame, Indiana
46556-5639, U.S.A., e-mail: agustin.fuentes@cwu.edu
Key Words: captive management, rehabilitation, gibbon conservation
Intraspecific behavioral flexibility, as well as behavioral variability among closely
related species, is becoming increasingly evident within the Order Primates. Additionally,
many primate species are either considered endangered or critically endangered. Efforts
to conserve and protect endangered nonhuman primates are influenced by the ways in
which we view species diversity and behavioral variability, and also by how well
conservationists understand human cultural, economic, and social interconnections.
Given certain complexities within the family Hylobatidae, including, but not limited
to, the occurrence of naturally occurring hybridization, effective conservation of
these organisms must include consideration of both long-term field observations and
human cultural and scientific influences. In light of an emerging perspective of
hylobatid social organization based on recent data from long-term studies of free-living
populations (Brockelman et al. 1998; Palombit 1995) and the re-examination
of existing data sets (Fuentes 2000), approaches to the rehabilitation and captive
management of hylobatids should be re-evaluated. Management strategies of displaced
hylobatids should also be developed in conjunction with the overall conservation
goals for the species in question. For example, hylobatid breeding and public display
may need to be in tight accordance with integrated conservation priorities.
We present a synthesis of data from monitoring efforts of the illegal pet-trade,
a behavioral study of displaced hylobatids, and theoretical developments in hylobatid
social organization. This effort emphasizes the complexities of hylobatid conservation
in source countries, as well as establishes a model for the assessment of human cultural
impacts. A primary goal of this paper is to provide guidance for and stress the importance
of future examinations of human and hylobatid interconnections in Southeast Asia.
Alan R. Mootnick
International Center for Gibbon Studies, P.O. Box 800249, Santa Clarita, CA 91380,
U.S.A., e-mail: gibboncenter@earthlink.net
Key Words: captive management, enclosure design, stress management
Gibbons (Hylobatidae) naturally live in the upper canopy, are generally observed
in a monogamous family unit, and are known for their territorial defense. When housing
gibbons in captivity, many factors need to be taken into consideration in order to
reduce their stress levels. It is not recommended to house more than one adult of
the same sex in an enclosure. It is important to create visual barriers between enclosures
to prevent hostile displays among gibbons. Hostile presenting between enclosures,
or housing gibbons in small enclosures could cause self-mutilation, abortion, infant
neglect, displaced aggression on infants, offspring to be peripheralized at an earlier
age, or suppression of the immune system. It is important to gradually introduce
gibbons to each other, especially if one of the gibbons is imprinted on humans. When
housing immature gibbons without their parents, they should not be housed with a
dominate or older gibbon who could hurt them. The removal of an offspring from its
family can stress the parents or other offspring. There is the potential for a gibbon
to be an inadequate parent if it did not observe parental care of siblings. Humans
should not be allowed to torment gibbons, and predators should be prevented from
being in close proximity to gibbon enclosures. Having a barking dog encircle an enclosure
has caused some gibbons to spend up to 3 weeks looking for the dog throughout each
day. Noise or machinery near gibbon enclosures could increase the chance of aborting.
The use of large machinery higher than a gibbon enclosure could cause gibbons to
abort. When removing gibbons from their enclosure, the best method for each situation
should be taken into consideration in order to reduce their stress levels. If these
suggestions are utilized when housing gibbons, they will live a much longer and healthier
life.
Timothy OíBrien, Margaret Kinnaird, Maya Prasetyaningrum,
Anton Nurcahyo and Muhammad Iqbal
Wildlife Conservation Society, P. O. Box 311, Bogor 16003, Indonesia, e-mail: wcs-ip@indo.net.id
Key Words: siamang, demography, habitat disturbance
Few studies have attempted to quantify the effects of severe habitat disturbance
on primate population dynamics, and data on the demography of lesser apes is almost
non-existent. We examined demographic characteristics of a siamang (Symphalangus
syndactylus) population (n=38 groups, 130 group-years) from 1998 through 2001
in a southern Sumatran forest recently disturbed by fires. The population was located
in a national park and not subject to hunting or logging disturbance.
Groups adjacent to the burn area were smaller (3.2 vs. 4.0 individuals, P=0.039),
produced fewer infants and juveniles (25.7% vs. 37.4%), and possessed smaller home
ranges than groups in unburned forest habitat. Interbirth intervals were slightly
longer for burn area groups (2.8 vs. 2.5 years), suggesting that females in the burned
area may be nutritionally stressed. Most important, infant and juvenile survival
was significantly lower among the burn area groups during the first four years of
life. The probability of an infant surviving to the subadult stage is 0.22 for burn
area groups and 0.62 for groups in better habitat. Compared to groups in unburned
forest, groups in burned forest had access to less than 50% as many large Ficus
spp. and Dracontomelum dao trees, the two main fruits in siamang diets. We
show that groups adjacent to burned forest occupy poor quality habitat with fewer
food sources, and we believe the reduced foraging time and increased resting time
associated with habitat disturbance results in the lower productivity and higher
mortality of young animals.
Pham Nhat
Faculty of Forest Resources & Environment Management, Forestry University of
Vietnam, Xuanmai, Hatay, Vietnam, e-mail: nhatfuv@hn.vnn.vn
Key Words: Nomascus, status, Vietnam
At least 5 subspecies of gibbons are found in Vietnam, including Nomascus concolor
concolor, Nomascus sp. cf. nasutus, Nomascus leucogenys leucogenys,
Nomascus leucogenys siki, and Nomascus gabriellae. This paper provides
information on their former and present distribution and their conservation status.
The most recent studies show that the distribution areas of all subspecies have been
narrowing due to habitat loss. All taxa are threatened to become extinct. Some solutions
for conserving of these animals in the wild will be discussed.
Benjamin Rawson
School of Archaeology & Anthropology, The Faculties, Australian National University,
Canberra ACT 0200, Australia, e-mail: ben.rawson@anu.edu.au
Key Words: Nomascus gabriellae, Cambodia, ecology
Samling logging concession is located in southern Mondulkiri province, Cambodia and
covers some 457,000 hectares. Amongst other primate species present here is the yellow-cheeked
crested gibbon (Nomascus gabriellae), listed as ëVulnerableí by the IUCN Red
List of Threatened Species. Found in southern Vietnam, southern Laos and eastern
Cambodia, no long-term study of this species has been conducted. To rectify this
a study has been initiated as of May 2002 in the Samling logging concession on the
ecology and behaviour of the species. Initial findings on the species ranging, feeding
and social behaviour, and activity patterns are presented here along with the potential
threats to populations within the concession from hunting and habitat disturbance.
Tanya A. Romaniuk
P.O. Box 1375, Agoura Hills, California 91376-1375, U.S.A., e-mail: tromaniuk@earthlink.net
Key Words: self-recognition, mirror images, facial paint-marking technique
The capacity for self-recognition is one indicator of a sense of self, and humans
were once considered to be unique in the capability of forming a self-concept (Gallup
1977). However, chimpanzees (Pan paniscus) and orangutans (Pongo pygmaeus)
have been observed using mirrors to explore body parts and facial paint-markings
that were otherwise not visible to them, thereby indicating the capacity to recognize
their own reflections (Gallup 1970; Suarez & Gallup 1981; Povinelli et al.
1993). Monkeys appear to lack this ability (Lethmate & Dücker 1973; Gallup
1977).
In the present study, the reactions of 16 gibbons (representing four species and
three genera of Hylobatidae) to their mirror images were observed in order
to determine whether age, sex, species, type of housing, and type of rearing differences
in mirror-responsiveness exist. The facial paint-marking technique was used on eight
of these gibbons in order to determine whether self-recognition is a feature exclusive
to the great apes and humans, or whether it is a general characteristic of all apes
and humans.
Results indicated that gibbons do respond to mirrors. They look into the mirror and
they exhibit social, contingent, and exploratory behaviors. However, the gibbons
that were given the facial paint-mark test failed to show conclusive evidence of
self-recognition. Ten white-handed gibbons (Hylobates lar), three agile gibbons
(Hylobates agilis), and one gibbon-siamang hybrid have previously failed the
paint-mark test (Hyatt 1998; Lethmate & Dücker 1973). However, one previous
study (Ujhelyi et al. 2000) reported that a juvenile siamang (Symphalangus
syndactylus) did exhibit a mirror-guided, mark-directed response to his facial
paint-mark. Although all gibbons do not display mirror-guided, mark-directed behavior
indicative of mirror self-recognition, they do respond to the mirror, indicating
some understanding of themselves within their environment.
La Quang Trung1, Trinh Dinh Hoang1,
Barney Long2 and Thomas Geissmann3
1 Fauna & Flora International ó Indochina Programme, IPO Box 78, 104B
Pho Hue, Hanoi, Vietnam, e-mail: ffi@fpt.vn
2 WWF Indochina Programme Office, 53 Tran Phu, Hanoi, Hanoi, Vietnam,
e-mail: barneylong@cwcom.net
3 Institute of Zoology, Tierärztliche Hochschule Hannover, Bünteweg
17, 30559 Hannover, Germany, e-mail: thomas.geissmann@gibbons.de
Key Words: Nomascus, status, Vietnam
The status of the crested gibbons (genus Nomascus) in Vietnam is poorly known.
No surveys in recent times have reliably recorded the presence of the two northern
species, the western black crested gibbon Nomascus concolor and the eastern
black crested gibbon N. sp. cf. nasutus. Since 1999, FFI-Indochina
(Fauna & Flora ó Indochina Programme) have been conducting numerous primate-focused
surveys to assess the status of these species and identify priority sites for their
conservation.
Our field surveys revealed the Che Tao ó Nam Pam forests (between Yen Bai and Son
La provinces) and the forests of Van Ban district (Lao Cai province) as the only
known sites in Vietnam where the occurrence of the western black crested gibbon has
been confirmed. The population in Che Tao ó Nam Pam consists of at least 40 groups
and 111 individuals. In Van Ban district, 14 groups have been identified, but some
of them are isolated from the main core of surviving groups.
In January 2002 we were finally able to locate the first confirmed population of
Nomascus sp. cf. nasutus in Vietnam since the 1960ís. This population
was discovered in Trung Khanh district (Cao Bang province) and consists of about
8 individuals totally (two groups and a single male). Even if vocal and DNA analyses
should indicate that the Eastern black crested gibbon in Vietnam and the Chinese
Hainan gibbon are the same species, the estimated global population of the species
amounts to only about 32 individuals, meaning that this gibbon is the worldís most
endangered primate species.
The results of our surveys highlight the critical status of these Vietnamese apes
due to hunting and habitat loss. Both species are on the brink of extinction in Vietnam
and, without species-focused conservation efforts, will become extirpated in the
next one to ten years.
Maria Ujhelyi and Zsofia Clemens
Semmelweis University, Institute of Behavioural Sciences, Hungary, e-mail: ujhmar@net.sote.hu
Key Words: self-recognition, mirror images, gibbons
In recent years, we have carried out long term mirror experiments using 11 gibbon
individuals from three genera (Hylobates lar 5, Nomascus spp. 2, Symphalangus
syndactylus 4 individuals). Animals differed in the amount of interest, activity
level, and types of investigative, exploratory and social behaviors exhibited in
relation to the mirror image and its uses. In order to obtain further information
about the nature of the individual differences, tests involving localizing hidden
objects via their mirror reflections were conducted. For this purpose, the mirror
was mounted outside the cage, and boxes serving as potential hiding places were affixed
to the cage bars facing toward the mirror. The subjects had no previous experience
with the setup and received no training.
In this situation, several individuals tried to retrieve the hidden object (visible
only through the mirror) by reaching toward the mirror, that is toward the "virtualî
location of the object, while others reached toward the open side of the real box.
These animals appeared to realize that the object visible in the mirror really had
another location, implying that they had incorporated a not directly visible part
of the surroundings into their mapping of it. Only such a mental rearrangement of
space can help explain their ability to retrieve the hidden object, which they did
on the first attempt, that is, without trial and error.
Differences found in the hidden object situations match the different levels of mirror
competence exhibited by the animals in the earlier studies. We have previously suggested
that species, gender and a variety of factors in the individualís life history may
be involved in the wide range of differences between the gibbonsí performances in
the presence of mirrors. The relative importance of these factors, and the causes
of possible species differences are still unknown.
Ci-Wen Yang1, Hou-Chun Chen1,
Po-Chung Chang1 and Kuang-Yu Hu2
1 Taipei Zoo, Taiwan, 30 Sec.2 Hsin Kuang Road, Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C.,
e-mail: dwx10@zoo.gov.tw
2 National Defense Medical College, Taipei Taiwan.R.O.C., e-mail: kyhu@ndmctsgh.edu.tw
Key Words: gibbon identification, DNA, vocal
In 1993, the Taipei Zoo surveyed the gibbons in Taiwan and located 77 Hylobates
lar, 3 H. moloch, 3 H. muelleri, 8 H. pileatus, 2 Bunopithecus
hoolock, 11 Nomascus spp., and 3 Symphalangus syndactylus,
totaling 166 gibbons. During that survey, the local government did not have accurate
means to identify gibbon species.
The Taipei Zoo cooperated with the National Defense Medical College of R.O.C. to
initiate the project "Phylogenetic analysis of gibbons at Taipei Zooî in August,
1999. During that project, we collected hairs and blood for DNA analysis. The molecular
indicated that 30 gibbons at the Taipei Zoo were 4 Hylobates agilis, 17 H.
lar, 4 H. muelleri, 1 Nomascus leucogenys, 2 N. gabriellae,
1 Symphalangus syndactylus, and one gibbon with ambivalent sequence data.
In addition, 1 gibbon housed outside the Taipei Zoo was 1 H. muelleri, and
2 captive gibbons at Shanghai Zoological Park were 2 N. leucogenys.
During a survey in 2000, we collected hairs and blood for molecular analysis and
obtained photographs of gibbon fur coloration from additional zoos and conservation
centers in Taiwan. In 2001, Alan Mootnick assisted a morphological survey of the
gibbons housed at the Taipei Zoo and zoos in the northern region. Our surveys include
111 captive gibbons in Taiwan.
During surveys in 2002, we will tape-record song bouts of the gibbons housed in Taiwan;
these will be identified by Thomas Geissmann in Germany. In cooperation with zoos
in Indonesia, Malaysia, Singapore and Thailand, we have begun surveying the captive
gibbons of the South East Asian Zoos Association (SEAZA). The Taipei Zoo plans to
establish a comprehensive database of the captive gibbon populations in South-east
Asia including molecular data, vocal data and fur coloration data. This data base
could serve as an important tool for ex-situ gibbon conservation.
Achmad Yanuar1, David J. Chivers1
and Jito Sugardjito2
1 Wildlife Research Group, Department of Anatomy, University of Cambridge,
Downing Street CB2 3DY, Cambridge, U.K., e-mail: ay343@yahoo.com
2 Fauna and Flora International-Indonesia Program, Jl. Bangbarung Raya,
Blok III, Kaveling 11, Bantar Jati, Bogor, Indonesia
Key Words: siamang, sympatry, habitat types
Two species of gibbons, the siamang (Symphalangus syndactylus) and the agile gibbon
(Hylobates agilis), occur sympatrically in and around the mountaineous forests of
the Barisan ridge in Kerinci-Seblat National Park (KSNP), west central Sumatra. Data
on density, distribution, group size and biomass of the two hylobatids are analysed
and discussed. The line-transect method was chosen and non-parametric statistics
were used in calculations and analysis.
Hylobates agilis can be observed in three habitat types (lowland, hill dipterocarp
and sub-montane forests), but is more common on the east side of the Barisan ridge
in KSNP. Higher group densities for H. agilis were found in hill dipterocarp forest,
and for S. syndactylus in montane and lowland forest.
Gibbon |